Search for: "In the Matter of Judge Hudson" Results 41 - 60 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 3:14 pm
A Hudson County trial judge  has issued a very interesting decision recently regarding a litigant's claim that the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to 35, is violative of the NJ and US Constitutions. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
However, because it did not contain a monetary value for the assets listed, the New Jersey divorce judge held it was void as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
In a recent trial court opinion issued by the Superior Court in Hudson County, Judge Gallipoli recognized that parents in NJ may have a right to collect damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress when their relationships with their children are poisoned by former spouses or even grandparents who partake in alienating behaviors. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:12 am by KC Johnson
”)The cases in which Hudson and Cline tangled, as the PA understood, involved matters in which Judge Hudson had claimed that the DA's office violated the constitutional rights of accused criminals--usually a point of view that self-styled “progressives” embrace but in Durham is anathema to the “activist” left. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:53 am by Lyle Denniston
  Vinson, in his final ruling, refused to strike down that provision as a separate matter. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:13 am by Donald Barbati
State law allows judges to hear cases that directly affect them when there is no other appropriate court to address the matter. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by Calvin Massey
  Let's also assume that Judge Hudson got it right in declaring the "tax" to be a penalty, and thus invalid if the underlying mandate is ultra vires, as he declared it to be. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:02 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Div. 2011), certification granted, (June 7, 2011) and certification granted in part, 23 A.3d 338 , 207 N.J. 66 (2011); new common-law remedy rejected 48 A.3d 991, 211 N.J. 276 (NJ 2012).The matter was reversed and remanded back to the judge of compensation for proceedings consistent with the Appellate Division's decision.LOUIS RIPP VS. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:34 am by Edward R. Weinstein
Moreover, as a matter of public policy of always protecting the best interests of a child, a judge does not necessarily ask the child, point blank, whom they would rather live with. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:42 am by Charles Abut
 When matters involving child custody and parenting are implicated in New Jersey divorce cases, the New Jersey divorce judge is authorized to appoint a guardian at litem to protect the children's interests. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 2:03 pm by Jeremy Saland
Criminal attorneys representing defendants in matters throughout New York City and the Hudson Valley, Crotty Saland PC was founded by two former Manhattan prosecutors. [read post]