Search for: "In the Matter of T A-K and J A-K" Results 41 - 60 of 1,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The fact that this system operated efficiently for many years was evidence that it was normally satisfactory (see T 30/90, J 31/90, J 32/90, T 309/88). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, this [letter] is a voluntary service of the Office. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The [Search Division] wishes to point out that this deficiency concerns not only the claims, but the whole subject-matter of the original application. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The situation referred to by the ED, whereby subject-matter in respect of which a search fee has not been paid can only be pursued in a divisional application, presupposes that the searched and non-searched inventions are in fact found to be non-unitary when the ED upon review agrees with the opinion of the search division (see decision J 3/09 [5.1-7] and references therein to decisions G 2/92 and T 631/97; see also Guidelines for Examination, C-III, 7.10, third and fourth… [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Most of the case law cited by the appellant (T 128/87, T 14/89, J 13/90) is also discussed in G 2/97. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Well, it has finally reached K’s law, too.The Opposition Division had revoked the patent. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:27 am
Hearing Disposal Written Decisions %1951 227 54(J)/80 (K) 241955 200 81(J)/126(K) 401960 1,271 273(J)/328(K)/320(M) 211970 2,569 258(J)/408(K)/507(M) 101980 2,433 239(J)/448(K)/511(M) 101990 4,348 405(J)/715(K)/769(M) 92000 4,320 714(J)/1548(K)/1769(M) 172003 6,905 714(J)/1324(K)/1147(M) 102005 4,382 861(J)/918(K)/858(M) 202006 4,762… [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
However, the party status of an opponent in opposition proceedings cannot be transferred to examination proceedings, opposition proceedings and examination proceedings being separate proceedings (see T 198/88 [2.1]). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am by Raymond Wee Hock Tan
Not much time for parents to care for 9thchild.wǒ zài xīn jiā pō zhǎnɡdà ,shì yì jiā 10kǒu de dì 9 ɡè hái zi 。wǒde fùqīn kāi chūzūchē,mǔqīn shì cáifénɡ。Suīrán jiā tínɡ tiáo jiàn bú tài hǎo ,kě… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This is so even if the subject-matter of the two applications is highly similar (see J 27/94 [3]). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Palmer and to Mr Hans-Jürgen Schmidt in May 1993 (hereinafter disclosure “Schmidt”). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:56 pm by stevemehta
 Economic Inquiry, Volume 47 Issue 2 , Pages 197 – 393 (April 2009) DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00154.x The post Early Employment Mediation: Timing Matters appeared first on The Blog of Steven Mehta. [read post]