Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. S., Child." Results 41 - 60 of 272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2022, 11:00 am by gabrielagendreau
Interested candidates should submit letter of interest, resume, two writing samples and three professional references to Leann Ferry, Director of Administration, California Indian Legal Services, 117 J St., Ste 201, Sacramento, CA 95814. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
And that’s what this post is about. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 11:38 am by gabrielagendreau
NARF’s main office is in Boulder, Colorado, with additional offices in Washington, D.C. and Anchorage, Alaska. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 2:00 pm by Emily Dai
The event will feature remarks from  J. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The childs very young age meant the child had no access to social media and any comments at nursery were likely to pass the child by completely. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
We do not think it can fairly be argued that Lieven Js conclusion, in the unusual circumstances of this case, was wrong. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:47 am by Emma Kent
’ Furthermore, Keehan J accepted the expert’s opinion that asking the children what their wishes and feelings were, would actually cause more harm and detriment to their welfare. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:45 am by Daniel
It doesn’t matter how the assets are titled. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
For good discussion of this in court opinions, including related to "harassment" laws, see, e.g., In the Matter of the Welfare of A.J.B. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the childs welfare. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
California, 220153Issue: Whether California’s sanctions against Texas and Texans – prohibiting state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas because Texas protects the religious freedom of faith-based child welfare providers within its borders – are born of religious animus and violate the Constitution’s privileges and immunities clause, interstate commerce clause and guarantee of equal protection. [read post]
The law has evolved to recognize legal parent-child relationships, regardless of the marital status of the childs parents. [read post]