Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. M. R., Parent"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 4:21 pm
In affirming the trial court’s ruling, the Appellate Division noted that a “[m]odification of an existing child custody order is a ‘two-step process. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
In most cases, the parents of minors, (i.e., children under 18) are responsible for making decisions relating to their child’s medical treatment. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
In ECHR terms, there can be no dispute that the issues in this case engaged the Art 8 right to family life of M and each of her parents. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Barry R. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Baby M. ruling sparked a national debate about surrogacy. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
The proposed “parent trigger bill,” though I strongly oppose it, would open the door to a “city trigger” in which Coral Gables [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:22 am
Div. 1997) (citing In re Baby M, 109 N.J. at 426). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
Of particular significance to Justice Sunshine was the parents’ collaboration on educational matters for the child. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm
"They said they would kill my sisters and my parents if I ever said anything," [name withheld] says. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
R. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:42 am
when I’m working. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:54 pm
And he (or, for that matter, she) works with children as a function of being drawn to them for reasons beyond their welfare. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Tribe, the Carl M. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:36 pm
(In every place I’m aware of, and as a parent of a DC child just starting as a freshman at Rice University, I am very aware, the old strategy of attend somewhere for a year and then get resident tuition doesn’t work anymore — whatever the residency rules for other things, generally a student will be an out-of-stater for the full four years.)Cohen particularly focuses on UCLA and UC Berkeley as examples of the new trend in college… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
Both parents should be independently responsible for their child's health, welfare, safety and happiness. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Fair Trial Denied Where Family Court Judge Took on the Function and Appearance of an Advocate In Matter of Jacquilin M, 83 A.D.3d 844, 922 N.Y.S.2d 111 (2 Dept, 2011) Jacqulin M. appealed from an order of disposition of the Family which, upon a fact-finding order of a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the… [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
While the situation did resemble that in R(M) v Hammersmith, it was not the same. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
While the situation did resemble that in R(M) v Hammersmith, it was not the same. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
, although the court would have been entitled to make some order if it thought that was the appropriate course of action bearing in mind the need to promote the welfare of the child, and taking into consideration the Article 6, 8 and 10 rights of ALL the parties (including the child). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:50 am
This would reflect the case law on contact, reinforcing the importance of the child continuing to have a meaningful relationship with both parents, alongside the need to protect the child from harm. [read post]
