Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. B. and W. S., Parents." Results 41 - 51 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The new rules do not apply to disclosures regarding health and welfare benefit plans, which the DOL believes to be a more challenging matter that requires further study. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
  “[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Docket No. 2234-06T4 (October 6, 2009) - Conviction for endangering the welfare of a child reversed, other convictions affirmed. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am by David Bernstein
As a resource for teachers, parents, and students I am going to list the errors and egregious misinterpretations of history I found in the last 1/3 of the book. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
And when a doctor describes to expectant parents that it will be expensive and emotionally burdensome if they choose to have a child that genetic tests show may have a disability. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
The juvenile court was envisioned more as a surrogate parent than a prosecutor. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
In Appleton, Mostyn conceded he might have gone a bit far there, and of course the Re S balancing exercise would still need to be carried out (see Re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47, which sets out the exercise judges must carry out to decide issues that engage competing convention rights, under Article 8 private and family life and Article 10 freedom of expression). [read post]