Search for: "Ingram v. Justice Court" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Mr Justice Silber ruled in the November 2011 case of AM v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:42 am by Adam Wagner
Mr Justice Silber ruled in the November 2011 case of AM v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am by John Steele
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 - “Campaigns for Judicial Office: The Impact of Caperton v. [read post]
  Scotland’s First Minister, Alex Salmond, and the Justice Secretary, Kenny MacAskill, accused the Supreme Court of illegitimate interference in Scotland’s criminal justice system, questioned the qualifications of its justices to pronounce on matters of Scots Law, and even threatened to withdraw Scottish funding of the Court. [read post]
Scotland’s First Minister, Alex Salmond, and the Justice Secretary, Kenny MacAskill, accused the Supreme Court of illegitimate interference in Scotland’s criminal justice system, questioned the qualifications of its justices to pronounce on matters of Scots Law, and even threatened to withdraw Scottish funding of the Court.  [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm by Kent Scheidegger
David Ingram has this post, with the above title, at BLT.She is right, to that extent, of course. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
Ingram notes that the case could ultimately reach the Court because the Ninth Circuit’s decision conflicts with a 2007 ruling by the D.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Steve Hall
"Verrilli argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court, including 2008's Baze v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:55 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  For executive branch nominations, the President should be allowed to name who he wants, within reason.Today, the US Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in the Arizona capital case of Ryan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
In another unanimous judgment (again with Justice Kagan recused), the Court held in Staub v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am by Amanda Rice
The Washington Post reports that the Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]