Search for: "Institute For Justice v. IRS"
Results 41 - 60
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Institute for Justice and the National Rifle Association, the case was re-argued. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
”) The case, backed by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, was brought by Carvin and his colleagues at Jones Day. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Miranda v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:19 pm
I suspect that this message will have resonance with the majority, and perhaps with some of the other Justices as well. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Ginsburg prevailed by a vote of 8-1, but only four justices agreed with her that courts should apply strict scrutiny to gender-based classifications. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Revise RFRA so that it does not apply to entities other than religious organizations as defined by the IRS. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
The Institute for Justice, Alban’s employer, thinks there’s a better alternative to increased government regulations: voluntary certifications. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
The case, M.H. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
" But, she asked, how is that injury "traceable to the IRS or to HHS. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at an upcoming case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm
District Court in Texas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:41 am
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In King v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
Commentary continues on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
As Justice Scalia observed in Employment Division v. [read post]
