Search for: "Institute for Wildlife Protection v. US Fish and Wildlife"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a memo clarifying that the Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918 would no longer hold people or corporations liable for incidental killings of birds. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a notice that the agency will begin a five-year review of five northeastern species under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Davis 15-424Issue: Whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
Fish and Wildlife Service. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Department of the Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lifted the ban on importing certain sport-hunted elephant trophies. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing a Nevada desert flower, known as Tiehm’s buckwheat, under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Koontz's proposed development would adversely impact Riparian Habitat Protection Zone ["RHPZ"] fish and wildlife, and that the purpose of the mitigation was to offset that impact. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
This left “more than one million acres of wetlands unmapped and without protection. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Preventing coal companies from using compliance schedules to loophole around th [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Gantner v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service—are tasked with preserving each monument in its original condition. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Its position is based in the claim that the ongoing operation of the pipeline violates the “public trust doctrine” and that there is a common law obligation on the state to protect waters such as the Great Lakes in favour of the public interest for navigation, hunting, and fishing.[4] At this point, the May 12 deadline has passed as both sides are participating in court-ordered mediation. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Greene’s Energy Group, SAS Institute v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
