Search for: "Interest of J.W." Results 41 - 60 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2019, 10:15 am by msatta
By Siddharth Sonkar*   CONTEXT Last month, in an unprecedented cyber attack on J.W Marriott Hotel’s guest database, data relating to more than five-hundred million guests spanning over four years was stolen. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm by Andrew Delaney
In re A.W. and J.W., 2013 VT 107By Elizabeth Kruska Termination of parental rights: it’s serious, and it’s final. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:23 pm
Congrats to J.W. for his continued rise as a public commentator all things corporate. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Diane Marie Amann
Curcio, and Jessica Gabel Cino, Georgia State Law; Raye Rawls, University of Georgia J.W. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm by David Lat
.* Professor Dan Filler offers an interesting proposal for how to handle laptop access in class. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:38 am by David E. Bernstein
To my knowledge, only two members of the law faculty are affiliated with Mercatus, Todd Zywicki and J.W. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:53 am
Still, I would be interested to see what they say. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:15 pm by J.W. Verret
 If Calpers had to purchase D&O insurance coverage for all of its candidates, however, I wonder if it would be as interested in nominating so many? [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
The Indiana court is asked for the following relief: • An injunction prohibiting Defendant and its agents from marketing, importing, offering for sale, selling, advertising or promoting or distributing in the United States any products that infringe the '435 patent;• An Order that all infringing products, as well as all means for producing, advertising or promoting those products, be destroyed;• An Order that all infringing products already distributed be recalled;•… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:12 am by Geoffrey Manne
, have engendered some of our best–and most interesting–disputes. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Jeff Sovern
Here's the statutory text: Abusive- The Bureau shall have no authority under this section to declare an act or practice abusive in connection with the provision of a consumer financial product or service, unless the act or practice— (1) materially interferes with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service; or (2) takes unreasonable advantage of-- (A) a lack of understanding on the part of the consumer of the material risks,… [read post]