Search for: "International Parts Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Trump reversed ZTE penalties in exchange for trade concessions with China. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Trump reversed ZTE penalties in exchange for trade concessions with China. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
Corp., 97 N.Y.2d 195, 199 (2001); see also Duane Reade Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:31 am
Md. 1998); Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Comm'r of Internal Revenue. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
I’ve been writing a fair bit about Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rulemaking initiatives. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Highlights this week included: CAFC: Legal malpractice in federal courts: Warrior Sports v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:45 am
See Intel Corp. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
International Trade Commission, No. 2022-1649 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Southeast Region. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Southeast Region. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:01 am
International Trade Commission and The Chamberlain Group (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm
An important part of the Commission’s responsibility is determining how best to deploy the resources that Congress entrusts to us. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPKat),Spare part design protection: the European Parliament's view: (IPKat), (Catch us if you can)Cyprus fails to delight Turkey - Cyprus is to gain PGI recognition for Turkish delight: (IPKat),Mewsings on the word ‘technical' (What does the EPO mean when it uses the word ‘technical'?) [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
See Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Christine Wilson (like Ken Heyer and other scholars) advocates a “total welfare standard” (consumer plus producer surplus). [read post]
