Search for: "Interstate Police v. C. & S. Bank"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Ford, No. 08-5091 Defendant's bank robbery sentence is vacated, where the District Court improperly sentenced Defendant as a career offender under U.S.S.G. section 4B1.1(a) because his previous conviction for a "walkaway" escape was not a "crime of violence" under the Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Interstate Brands Corporation2nd Cir.New Rights for Disabled EmployeesBrady v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Branch, No. 06-4257 Conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed where: 1) there was no question that the police were allowed to detain defendant after witnessing him commit a traffic violation; and 2) during this detention the police formed a "reasonable suspicion" of ongoing criminal activity that justified extension of the traffic stop; and 3) defendant's other claims were without merit. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
WAGNER, Chief of Police of the City of Hollywood, Florida, MICHAEL J. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Moses, No. 074508 Conviction following plea of guilt to possession of crack cocaine and to being a felon in possession of a firearm was sentenced to 262 months' imprisonment is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the police officers' warrantless entry into the two residences was unsupported by probable cause and exigent circumstances; and therefore 2) defendant's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches was violated. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Title: Cobell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Franklin, No. 05-2539, 05-2680, 05-2693 A sentence for bank robbery charges imposed following a remand for resentencing is vacated and remanded pursuant to the government's claims of error that: 1) the dis [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Gonzales, 127 S. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 3 provides that surrender may be refused on the grounds that the person sought is a national of the requested State, but that each party’s Executive Authority–in the case of the United States, the Secretary of State–shall have the power to extradite its nationals, unless prohibited by its domestic legislation, if, in its discretion, it deems it appropriate to do so. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Holyoke, MA; Armando Santiago, President) A&C Cleaning Corp. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
So what’s missing? [read post]
