Search for: "Ip v. Henderson" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm by Lawrence Higgins
The program will also include a panel of IP experts such as Tara Rosnell and Christopher V. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Town of Gilbert, the First Amendment and Signs – Arlington attorney Matthew Roberts of Bean Kinney & Korman on the firm’s Virginia Real Estate, Land Use & Construction Law blog Florida Legislature Goes After Patent Trolls – Fort Myers lawyer Mark Nieds of Henderson Franklin on the firm’s Southwest Florida Business & IP Bulletin The Importance of a Cooperative Discovery Process – New York lawyer Kathryn Cole of Farrell Fritz… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
 But, as held by Judge Birss QC (as he then was) in Henderson v All Around the World Recordings Ltd [2013] EWPCC 19, the exercise of that discretion is conditional on the special rules as to the costs in the then Patents County Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by Alex Loomis
On December 28, the Justice Department filed an amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
 There are IP consequences attached to a name. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
”  Starbucks’ application for an expedited trial  Arnold J first referred to the principles reviewed by Henderson J in JW Spear & Sons v Zynga Inc [2012] EWHC 1374 (Ch) at para [16]? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm by Joe Mullin
Contrast that with the hundreds of thousands of dollars—at going rates for IP litigation FedEx's costs—that FedEx has probably spent in legal fees to "uninvent" the '377 patent. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The IP Kat Blog has analysed the case of Bastei Lübbe, C-149/17, which considered whether the provider of an internet connection could be held liable for any copyright infringement which took place using that connection. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
The IPKat blog has a post about the decision entitled “Supreme Court: IP exists but can’t be defined”. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
(v) were 32Red's Community marks and United Kingdom trade marks valid;? [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]