Search for: "Irons v. Levi"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
These are set out in a famous Supreme Court of Canada case, namely R. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
”Maria Forte (Maria Forte Music Services) explained how complex it can be for acts of a certain size, saying she was brought in by Iron Maiden’s management as they felt they weren’t getting what they were due - again with the amounts deducted in settlements not reflecting the amounts received back to remunerate the band's songwriters. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
In Gintert v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
On 9 November 2011, the same judge began hearing an application in the case of Levy v Coomber. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:54 pm
As the most recent example, see the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:26 am
Perhaps not ironically, the Justice had written the majority opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judges, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judicial salaries, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:43 am
When states ban gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, for instance, they cite Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm
AUCC’s objection was filed by Glen Bloom, who acted for the law publishers in the CCH v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
I debated this and related points with AC’s CEO Roanie Levy over a year ago at Brock University.Instead, it is pressing ahead for a consolidated blanket license-based tariff hearing and seeking some arguably highly overreaching tariff rates for rights that it arguably doesn’t have for repertoire that it arguably doesn’t have – and, of course, wants these tariffs to be retroactive and “mandatory”. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:56 pm
That exception, touching on issues of human rights and economic activity, has itself been limited by courts at times (National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Class 46), Managing Intellectual Property guide to trade mark blogs: (Managing Intellectual Property), gTLD expansion ahead: (Managing Intellectual Property), Interview with Hugo Boss general counsel regarding brand protection: (Managing Intellectual Property), When IP rights collide – trade mark rights just one piece of larger IP puzzle when securing brand protection: (Managing Intellectual Property), Iron man: Marvel morphs into a movie studio – Film financing and… [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
Patterson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm
And in the famous Pacifica case, the Court upheld fines levied against a radio station for airing the famous George Carlin monologue that, not-so-ironically, satirizes the FCC for banning seven particular words from being uttered over the public airwaves. [read post]
