Search for: "J R Express"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:38 pm
Edward J. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
In general, a mistake or ignorance of the law is an insufficient ground for re-establishment: see J 5/94 [3.1], J 27/01 [3.3.1], J 2/02 [8] and J 6/07 [2.4-5]. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:18 am
Newman and Steven J. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The EBA did not give any definition of the expression “substantive rights” in this context. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
Later, on March 11, 2010, the applicant was told that the appeal had been transferred to the Legal Board of appeal (LBA).In a communication dated March 23, 2011, the Legal Board expressed doubts as to its competence. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:37 am
Mon collègue Jérôme Lafrenière vous a récemment parlé de l’arrêt Chouiefaty, cette décision de la Cour fédérale du Canada qui concerne la pratique d’examen de l’Office de la Propriété Intellectuelle du Canada (OPIC) pour déterminer l’admissibilité à la protection par brevet d’une invention mise en œuvre par ordinateur. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:06 am
By J. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:51 pm
Suburban Express is threatening students right now. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:37 am
Feb. 3, 2011 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 8:15 pm
Noonan -- Craig Venter's colleagues at the J. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
R. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:19 am
R. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:19 am
R. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:04 am
R. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
Evans & R. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:34 am
“We would like to express our gratitude to Senator Bateman for his sponsoring of the ‘Timothy J. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 4:05 pm
” And CBC News reports that “Freedom of expression pitted against dignity as Quebec comedian’s case heard by Supreme Court; Comedian Mike Ward argues he has the right to mock disabled singer Jérémy Gabriel. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 11:38 am
Blay-Grabarczyk, Le statut du lanceur d’alerte dans les arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme J. [read post]
