Search for: "J. DOES 1-100"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 3:58 pm
We sold this company to Arthur J. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:58 pm
J. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Donald J. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
It’s annoying, but does it do us any harm? [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:35 pm
J. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
Postal Service, Docket No. 17-1594, J. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:30 am
”1 And despite the turbulence over the last decade in the market for legal services in which Big Law participates, these law firms have deepened their footprint internationally: the firms on the Global 100 list have added nearly 200 additional offices outside of the U.S. and more than 6,600 lawyers during the decade ending in 2019.2 But what does it mean to be a global “firm” for purposes of the Global 100? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Does 1–435, No. 10–4382, at *1 (N .D.Cal. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
Matthew J. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:42 am
The Law Office of Brian J. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
S. 663, 664 n. 1, 666 (1966); ante, at 30 (Souter, J., dissenting). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Ultimately, however, C&J shareholders were exchanging 100% ownership of C&J for 47% control in the post-merger entity. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:14 am
Citizen 204(a)(1)(A)(iv) IB3 Child of IB1 204(a)(1)(A)(iii) VI5 Parent of U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:20 am
By Katherine J. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
Posted by: Salvatore J. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:59 am
An income tax does this most neutrally when it attempts to capture a business’s average profitability over time rather than a mere snapshot of the business’s income in any given year. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:17 pm
" The only fact necessary to justify such a variance is the sentencing court's disagreement with the guidelines – its policy view that the 100-to-1 ratio creates an unwarranted disparity.See Spears, __ S.Ct. at __, 2009 WL 129044 at *2 (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:17 pm
" The only fact necessary to justify such a variance is the sentencing court's disagreement with the guidelines – its policy view that the 100-to-1 ratio creates an unwarranted disparity.See Spears, __ S.Ct. at __, 2009 WL 129044 at *2 (quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
J. 875 (2007)), Professor John R. [read post]
