Search for: "J.B. Van Hollen"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 8:22 am
"Attorney General appeals restraining order on labor law; Van Hollen asks appeals court to lift judge's temporary order": Today's edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contains an article that begins, "In a case that appears bound for the state Supreme Court, Attorney General J.B. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 pm
Van Hollen appealed the decision by a county judge enjoining publication of legislation that would curtail collective bargaining rights for public employees. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:09 am
Van Hollen declared the law dead. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:52 am
Van Hollen speaks like the well-polished politician he is. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Van Hollen and Democratic state representative Jon Richards (who defended the constitutionality of the mandate).Enjoy! [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:06 pm
Van Hollen (Wisconsin recently became one of the 28 states challenging the mandate in court) and Democratic state representative Jon Richards, who will defend the constitutionality of the mandate. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
Van Hollen ranging from 6 to 13 points. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Van Hollen might be in the best position of any political candidate in Wisconsin. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
Van Hollen (right) made their first joint appearance on Oct. 7 at Marquette University Law School. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:02 pm
Van Hollen, Attorney General of Wisconsin, No. 09-1883, will appear in CCH Trade Cases. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
Van Hollen says this ruling should be applied narrowly....Van Hollen said the public should be able to seek records under the law that would shed light on how well government is working and whether public employees are wasting time during work hours. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:29 am
Van Hollen to file a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:57 am
Attorney General J.B. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
Van Hollen, No. 2008AP001868 (Wis. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 7:38 am
Van Hollen for his decision last month not to defend the state's new domestic registry in Appling v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 1:34 am
Van Hollen announced his decision not to defend the state's new domestic registry law in Appling v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:01 am
State Attorney General J.B. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:54 am
Because state Attorney General J.B. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:38 am
On August 21st, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B Van Hollen announced his decision not to defend Wisconsin's new domestic registry law in Appling v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:09 am
According to the State Journal, Doyle has "blasted Van Hollen's decision. [read post]
