Search for: "JACK V. SMITH"
Results 41 - 60
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:20 am
Trump argued that he is shielded from criminal liability in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against him, which alleges that Trump interfered in the 2020 US presidential election. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
When Federal District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the election interference case brought against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith, turned aside Trump’s immunity claim, she noted that the former president was asking her to convey on him “the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
I also think the Jack Smith prosecution of Trump is unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:42 pm
I won my campaign to get the Supreme Court to deny Special Counsel Jack Smith's petition for certiorari before judgement. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:04 pm
[United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:42 pm
Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein of Politico have a report headlined “What Jack Smith won’t say; The special counsel is emphasizing the public interest in a speedy Trump trial; He hasn’t spelled out the true reason the timing is so crucial. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
And on Jan. 10, in Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
Private citizen Jack Smith lacks standing to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari before judgement in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Because the court’s ruling in that case, Fischer v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Have you heard what Donald Trump has to say about "Deranged Prosecutor" Jack Smith? [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
On Monday, in Tingley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
” Special Counsel Jack Smith may be contemplating the same fate. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
ShareTwo days after Special Counsel Jack Smith asked the justices to decide quickly whether former President Donald Trump can face criminal charges for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 elections, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case that could affect the charges against Trump even if the court ultimately rules that he is not immune from prosecution. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:07 am
[The Court agreed to the special counsel's request for expedited briefing on whether to grant certiorari. ] Yesterday, Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a petition for certiorari before judgment in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Smith’s brief is here: US v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
” In the federal indictment charging Trump with election interference, Special Counsel Jack Smith notes that Giuliani sent this text message “despite still having established no fraud in Michigan. [read post]
