Search for: "JACOBS v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
Cahn, Jacob H. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
& Pol’y 451-489 (2010).Werksman, Jacob and Kirk Herbertson. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” At National Review, Alexandra DeSanctis weighs in on Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Circuit’s ruling in Jaber v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
That case was Jacobs Engineering Group v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:00 pm
It is also meant to safeguard national security and the public good. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 2:30 pm
Marquis’s previous review of Coll’s book can be found here.On Rational Security, Anderson was joined by Natalie Orpett, Bower, and Matt Gluck to talk over some of the week's big national security news, including President Joe Biden’s fourth and final speech as president to the U.N. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Circuit, for example, in Doe v. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
Professors Jody Freeman and Sharon Jacobs have characterized this practice as among those making agency personnel overly vulnerable to inappropriate Presidential staffing decisions. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
The Telegraph has the photos, pulled from Iran’s semi-official ISNA news agency. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:57 am
Dawes, (we filed an amicus brief), and United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Surveillance The US supreme Court declined to hear an appeal filed by the Wikimedia Foundation challenging the mass online surveillance practices of the National Security Agency. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
See, e.g., Jacobs v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
