Search for: "JACOBS v. WARD"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Resources J. 883-942 (2009).Saltzman, Rachel Ward. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Ward for alerting the AmeriKat to this story. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
The winner: Cat(therine) Slater (Serjeants) suggests that “the successful IP lawyer will be wearing a new perfume/aftershave soon to launch with a marketing campaign devised by Lord Justice Jacob: “L’Oréal … beyond the wildest dreams of the poor” [If this allusion needs explanation, see Jacob LJ's comments in L’Oréal v Bellure, noted here by the IPKat]”. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
But the Supreme Court itself in the Plyler v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:29 am
Jacob LJ takes up the story from here:"18. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:45 pm
At the Court of Appeal, Ward LJ disagreed. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:15 am
Brissett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Clark v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:07 pm
In "Two Years of Patent Office Opinions," Nicholas Braddon, in IP Law and Strategies on January 24, 2008 takes a brief look at the basics of the UK Patent Office launched its Opinions service before analysing certain aspects of its performance to-date and some of the opportunities that it may provide.Thanks to Hal Wegner for also pointing out that in in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 23 (Ct. of Appeal 2008)(Ward, Mummery, Jacob, JJ.), the Court… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
In Globis Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
The three-man Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Ward, Neuberger and Moore-Bick) agrees. [read post]
