Search for: "JACOBSEN V KATZER" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm by LTA-Editor
Katzer can be used to interpret the terms of open-source licenses, including the GPL v.2, GPL v.3, Apache License v.2, BSD License, and the Mozilla Public License. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm by LTA-Editor
Katzer can be used to interpret the terms of open-source licenses, including the GPL v.2, GPL v.3, Apache License v.2, BSD License, and the Mozilla Public License. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's rolling papers.Now that we all… [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Essentially, software programmers put up programming code that anyone can download, modify, use and distribute for free, as long as the "borrowed" or "open source" code is clearly indicated and enabled for the distributee to copy, download and use.On August 13, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Jacobsen v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:52 am by Andres
The main ruling dealing with the contract/licence dichotomy came in the US decision of Jacobsen v Katzer, where the 9th Circuit had to decide on this very legal question for the purpose of declaring the validity of the Artistic License, an open source software licence. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:52 am by Andres
The main decision dealing with the contract/licence dichotomy came in the US decision of Jacobsen v Katzer, where the 9th Circuit had to decide on this very legal question for the purpose of declaring the validity of the Artistic License, an open source software licence. [read post]