Search for: "JOHN DOE V DEPT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
We have warned Galvan's attorney, John G. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Ickes v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:41 am
Correction Connection, (E.D.Pa. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Heller and in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Using HGN scores alone resulted in 100% classification of BAC >.10% and 90% correct classification below .10%. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.4th 936, 944.) [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Dept. of Child Svc [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
ALP’s exculpatory clause was an almost verbatim copy of the language of Section 402 (b) (1) of the Business Corporation Law, and a twin of the exculpatory clause in an LLC’s operating agreement in John v Varughese, 194 AD2d 799 [2d Dept 2021], a case about which we recently wrote. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:19 am
It does not. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
In my view, when one does originalism, one must report all the evidence one finds in a particular source, so in my 2004 article, The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power, I presented all the evidence I found on this subject in Madison’s notes of the Philadelphia, including the one person–John Mercer–who did not like this power (though he never denied its existence). [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
WA Dept. of Corrections – How Much Document Searching Must Be Done? [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
Arizona Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
; Does the decision below depart from the essential requirements of the law? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
John T. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
