Search for: "JOHN DOES 1-12"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
I was delighted to have been invited to participate in the Asser Institute: Center for International and European Law & University of Amsterdam Law School-[Spring Academy] Technologies of sustainability due diligence: Digital tools and global value chain regulations which takes place in The Hague, Netherlands from 8-12 April 2024. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Chan was f0und guilty on all 12 counts of corruption in a case focused on financial benefits provided by real estate developers with projects in Huizar’s district. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
… It certainly does not ensure that the work has been fully vetted in terms of the data analysis and the proper application of research methods. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am
Patent No. 1,877,504, issued to Dow Chemical employees John Grebe and Ross Sanford on September 12, 1932. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
Tawfik does indeed mention. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
It is unfortunate that, whilst it does not suggest any alteration in the works proposed, it does raise urgent concern about the stability of the painted ceiling which will require a detailed condition survey which, the conservators advise should be before the works, the subject of this faculty, commence. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Yet, it does not justify an interpretation of the Constitution that tolerates let alone sustains corporate infringement of individual rights and encroachment on governmental powers. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:12 am
Marlene Gebauer 1:07 Yeah. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Circuit remanded to the district court, the agency considered further, then reaffirmed its decision with an additional explanation, and the parties then stipulated to dismissal.[12] No judicial decree purporting to undo the rule or any part of it went into effect. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
”[1] We’ve all taken tough positions: Beatles vs. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
It signaled what appeared to be the ending of a long arc of development with the abandonment of the project to produce a Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (the “Norms”).[1] It was also the year that saw the announcement of the appointment of John Ruggie as Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business… [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
In October 2021, Justice Barrett wrote her influential concurrence in John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:18 pm
This post introduces the manuscript's Chapter 3 ("The Formation of Intent and the Foundation of Text: The Travaux Préparatoires of SRSG John G. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 1:25 am
With Alexis Jay and John O’Brien. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
John Rogers pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and conspiracy to obstruct justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
