Search for: "JONES v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS"
Results 41 - 60
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
Jones, supra).State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Argument in Vance will be divided among attorneys for the New York County District Attorney’s Office, attorneys for the president and attorneys from the Justice Department. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
Ashley v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Attorney Jones responded: "Great, thanks. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
In support of its assertion the State simply quoted the judge=s discussion of Jones v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Papageorge, University of San Diego School of Law, Special Prosecutor, San Diego County District Attorney’s Office Thomas Greene, Executive Director, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Professor Jesse W. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
Jones, where one of Paula Jones’s claims was a state-law defamation claim that encompassed statements made after Clinton assumed office, the Eighth Circuit went out of its way to note that it was “not free from doubt” whether defamation fell within the outer perimeter of the President’s official duties (but left the ultimate issue for the district court on remand). [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
