Search for: "JONES v. WINTERS" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 8:30 am by David Kimball-Stanley
The government brief emphasized that preliminary injunctions are extraordinary tools, pointing to the Supreme Court’s precedent in Winter v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:30 am by David Kimball-Stanley
The government brief emphasized that preliminary injunctions are extraordinary tools, pointing to the Supreme Court’s precedent in Winter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
I cannot hear those bleak notes without choking up, and today was no exception. -------------------- * In the brief filed in Winter v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 [Merpel apologises to this blog's readers in the Southern hemisphere, for whom summer is winter and who have been entertaining both themselves and us with such fascinating gems as New Zealand's prophetic or head-in-the-sand attitude towards the patentability of computer programs. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm by admin
Kelly, 42 Ohio App. 3d 184 (1987). [4] Freels v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:23 am
  This last item, of course, led indirectly to  two prosecutions of Scruggs -- the first stemming from his game of keepaway with the help of AG Jim Hood with the documents in defiance of Judge Acker's order, the second as a result of the conspiracy to bribe Judge Lackey in the Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Peacock’s solicitors, Hodge, Jones & Allen have released a statement here. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:00 am
" Mervyn Griffith-Jones, prosecuting counsel, R v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
And the serial rescheduled cases also appear to have settled their brains for a long winter’s nap. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]