Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
It is a discursive universe in which politics was presumed to be a dirty word, and that it was to be made palatable only through the benign and watchful management of law. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:14 pm
Thus, for instance, the California Supreme Court in Balboa Island Village Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
For example, a woman claimed a pharmacy allowed her husband to watch CCTV footage of her buying a pregnancy test kit. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm
Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit with assistance from Judicial Watch, Inc., which states it is conservative but not partisan and committed to education, transparency and accountability in government. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Surveillance The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Merchandising Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:18 am
The lawsuit, United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Romag Fasteners Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
” (relisted after the June 13 conference) Dex Media Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
NAACP, 18-588 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
(relisted after the May 23 conference) Charter Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am
Simek at Sensei Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
And that is to say nothing of the grant in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
