Search for: "Jack L. Doe"
Results 41 - 60
of 693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 5:51 am
Of course, the indictment does not cite all the evidence they have in their possession. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
More uniquely, Section 241 does not require the commission of an overt act to establish criminal liability. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
Bad Spaniels (L), Jack Daniel's (R) ...Whereas the District Court had initially found in favour of Jack Daniel’s, rejecting VIP's nominative fair use and First Amendment defences, the Ninth Circuit, on appeal, reversed the District Court’s decision in favour of VIP Products, ruling that (as previously reported by the IPKat):Bad Spaniels was an “expressive work” protected by the First Amendment; andthat there was no dilution of… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
Robyn Dixon, Kareem Fahim, and David L. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
This Nation’s constitutional history does not tolerate that choice. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
Some text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm
” Then in June, the Supreme Court decided a trademark dispute sparked by a poop-themed dog toy that resembles a Jack Daniel’s liquor bottle. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
L. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Is this not the way the American Creed does its work? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:17 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
The theory itself isn't the basis for the Roy Cohn/Louis XIV (l'état, c'est moi) view of executive power.(3) HypocrisyDespite its problematic framing, the Times story does point to the fundamental hypocrisy of the Trumpists: "They are condemning Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 7 Brand Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” into “The Old No. 2 On Your Tennessee Carpet” does not receive special First… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 7 Brand Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” into “The Old No. 2 On Your Tennessee Carpet” does not receive special First… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No. 7 Brand Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” into “The Old No. 2 On Your Tennessee Carpet” does not receive special First… [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
What, after all, does it really mean? [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Jeffrey White dismissed the case, finding the ordinance does not directly regulate who can speak or what they can say. [read post]
