Search for: "Jackson v. State of South Carolina" Results 41 - 60 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
South Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP (reversing a lower court judgment that had invalidated South Carolina's electoral map on the ground that it was racially gerrymandered to undercut Black voting strength). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Samarth Desai
” Congress backed Jackson by offering South Carolina a compromise. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  North Carolina and Rhode Island had not ratified the Constitution, but significantly neither state rejected it. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hobby Lobby, 67 South Carolina Law Review 73-97 (2015).Emilia Justyna Powell, Islamic Law States and the Authority of the International Court of Justice: Territorial Sovereignty and Diplomatic Immunity, 79 Law & Contemporary Problems 209-236 (2016).Evan C. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In language strikingly reminiscent of South Carolina’s stance in the nullification crisis of the early 1830s, the viewpoint of the states that attempted to secede during the Civil War, and the Southern Manifesto that defiantly asserted the constitutionality of Jim Crow in the 1950s, SAPA purports to nullify various federal statutes claimed to conflict with a tendentiously extreme version of the Second Amendment. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Ilya Somin
That's true in Oregon, as I mentioned, but also New Mexico, South Carolina, Nebraska, the list goes on of states that provide compensation under the Fifth Amendment because they understand the Fifth Amendment to require compensation. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:24 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
South Carolina (2002) -- capital defendant's due process right to inform jury of his parole ineligibility FEC v. [read post]