Search for: "Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores" Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 1:57 am
A design will have distinctiveness and protection when it can be shown that the design has acquired a secondary meaning (Wal-Mart Stores v Samara Bros (2000)). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The industry attorneys argued in the stay filings that, since the Court appears likely to hear the Wal-Mart appeal, raising due process issues about federal class-action cases (Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:52 am by Jon Hyman
Wal-Mart certiorari petition – from Ted Frank at PointOfLaw Forum Dukes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Patents4Life) CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) Bilski v Doll – Petitioner’s brief, amicus briefs (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (BlawgIT) (PatentBIOtech) (Patently-O) (AwakenIP)   Global Global - General… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of 59yo Store Mgr's age/discharge claim> Drake v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 18, 2009)Sex harassment claims lead to this decision involving stolen e-mails and the Stored Communications Acto:p>Noted here: Law.Com; Ellen Simon's Employment Rights Post5th CircuitTaylor v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Wal-Mart Stores4th Cir.Reasonableness Not Required For Participation Retaliation ClaimCumbie vs. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:30 am
Two months later, her daughter, Robin, applied for a position at the same Wal-Mart store. [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:00 pm
» Blog Network Watch employees who are not careful on what they post on blog sites may end up losing their jobs if they are caught incidentally by their employers when they post something negative about their company and workplace. 8th Circuit rules in favor of Wal-Mart in disabled worker case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. did not discriminate against a worker when it reassigned her to a lower-paying maintenance job after she was injured, a federal… [read post]