Search for: "Jacobs v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
A subtle but intelligible distinction, at least in the view of this GuestKat.The position was similar to that in Celltech v Medimmune [2004] EWHC 1522; [2004] EWCA Civ 1331, where the courts (Jacob LJ upholding Laddie J) held that the parties had bargained to give jurisdiction to the English court concerning the scope of the licensed patents. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Campaign Legal Center, Noah Lindell discusses last week’s an opinion in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am by Jason M. Halper
Energy (USA), LLC, 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013), declined to extend deference to, and disagreed with, the SEC’s interpretation of the Dodd-Frank protections. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]