Search for: "Jacobson v. Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Deniz Yavuz (Purdue University), on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: Currency Shocks, Index funds, Indexing, stock market, stock prices Navigating ESG Fatigue in Shareholder Voting Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: anti-ESG, directors, ESG, Executive Compensation, HCM, investors, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Shareholders Chancery Court Invalidates Advance Notice Bylaws – Kellner v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Deniz Yavuz (Purdue University), on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: Currency Shocks, Index funds, Indexing, stock market, stock prices Navigating ESG Fatigue in Shareholder Voting Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Monday, January 22, 2024 Tags: anti-ESG, directors, ESG, Executive Compensation, HCM, investors, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Shareholders Chancery Court Invalidates Advance Notice Bylaws – Kellner v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:15 pm
Jacobson (In re Jacobson) (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:13 am
Payne in Texas, and Maverick v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
The federal district court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) on March 30, preventing Texas from enforcing the abortion ban pending a hearing on a preliminary injunction. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Hemphill v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
In Qualitex v Jacobson, (this was briefly discussed in my earlier blog post of non traditional trademarks) Qualitex sought protection over the green gold colour of their cleansing pads. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit: First, the 1905 case Jacobson v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:44 am
" Part II focused on Jacobson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
Shavers – SEC charged a Texas man and his company with defrauding investors in a Ponzi scheme involving Bitcoin. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Boggs (Corpus Christi, Texas)Atlantic v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The bonds in both the Jacobson and Nine Thirty FEF matters contain riders which provide that they will cover loss resulting directly from the dishonest acts of any Outside Investment Advisor na [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:40 am
As Justice Scalia wrote, dissenting in Lawrence v. [read post]
