Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 41 - 60 of 2,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
And because this is a state law case, not a fight about FCC rules, whatever the Court said would provide a blueprint for an unpredictable and likely chaotic next round of state must-carry laws and litigation. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
 That is the central reason why James Madison, seconded by James Wilson, first moved on June 1 that the Executive be vested with the power “to appoint to offices in cases not otherwise provided for. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[3]  These two strands—the refusal to settle with persons who deny the allegations and the belief that refusing to admit is a denial—converge in the requirement that to settle with the Commission, a person must either (1) admit the allegations underlying the Commission’s enforcement action or (2) state that she neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
A public comment submitted in 2018 pointed to the discrepancy between the Chinese legal regime’s loose regulation of the domestic antiquities trade and its hard stance on foreign exportation.[12] The two sections below explore China’s cultural property law and the current state of its art market. [read post]