Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset"
Results 41 - 60
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
Thomas-Rasset is expected to challenge the size of the award again, and the judge has already determined that $54,000 is the maximum acceptable size for an award given the evidence in the case.I'll update as more information becomes available.Jammie Thomas-Rasset Verdict [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm
The Recording Industry Association of America has appealed a judge's decision to slash the damages award levied against Jammie Thomas-Rasset for copyright infringement from $1.5 million to $54,000 one month ago. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
The RIAA's opposition papers to Jammie Thomas-Rasset's motion to set aside the verdict, in Capitol Records v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:40 pm
Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
Mike Masnick of Techdirt reports that the RIAA is anxious to settle the case in which it won $1.92 million from Jammie Thomas-Rasset for illegally downloading 24 songs. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a mother of four from Brainerd, Minn., was sued by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for willfully violating copyrights on 24 songs that were made available for download online. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:58 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset A jury last week determined the decade old question of just how much money a song is worth if it is illegally downloaded. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
Here's a summary so far from Ars Technica:What's next for Jammie Thomas-Rasset? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:10 pm
Testimony in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset file-sharing re-retrial concluded today as Thomas-Rasset took the stand and told the jury that she considers herself a big supporter of the music industry (read our coverage of day one). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports that a jury has condemned Jammie Thomas-Rasset to pay almost $2 million, or $80,000 per song, for having downloaded and freely distributed on a web site 24 songs. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:05 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset Much of Jammie Thomas-Rasset’s legal arguments following this summer’s $1.92 million Recording Industry Association of America file sharing jury verdict against her don’t have much weight or precedent. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:39 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Court again reduced the verdict to $2250 per infringed work, in a 43-page decision handed down on July 22nd. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
Thomas-Rasset, the RIAA's motion to preclude defendant from objecting to copyright registrations was denied.Judge Michael J. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:34 pm
Photo: Marmadon See Also: Jury in RIAA Trial Slaps $2 Million Fine on Jammie Thomas New Jammie Thomas Lawyers Vow to Put RIAA on Trial Jammie Thomas Lawyer: Get Me Off This Case! [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:36 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset was sentenced by a federal jury to pay the Recording Industry Association of America nearly $2 million for 24 counts of copyright infringement, according to multiple online news outlets. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Thomas. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm
Minn.) has reduced the judgment against Jammie Thomas-Rasset down from $80,000 per illegally downloaded song to $2,250. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm
Jammie Thomas-Rasset and her legal team are headed—they hope—for the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:05 pm
When Chief Judge Michael Davis slashed the jury's award against Jammie Thomas-Rasset from $80,000 to $2,250 per song, he gave the record label plaintiffs two choices: 1) accept the reduced award; or 2) return to Minnesota for a new trial on damages. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:21 am
The record label plaintiffs case have filed their brief opposing Jammie Thomas-Rasset 's last-minute attempt to avoid a third trial in the peer-to-peer copyright case. [read post]
