Search for: "Jane Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 41 - 60
of 798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm
" (Twitter feed of @AndyBorowitz) 3) Question: Hi, John Doe here. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:04 pm
It is also known as theBechdel/Wallace test,[1] the Bechdel rule,[2] Bechdel's law,[3] or the Mo Movie Measure.[4] Well he's right, and it's new to me, but I want to plug it into a larger matrix about women-talking-about-men-talking-about women and suchlike. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
The suit has also named several Jane Does as defendants, a legal tactic commonly used as a placeholder when the identities of defendants are unknown. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 10:44 pm
The Act essentially (1) provided for registration of marks that were in actual or intended use, and (2) created a cause of action for infringement for wrongful use of another's mark without permission. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
Jane Doe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
Jane Doe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm
Jane Doe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
See Jane C. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am
Somewhat more radically, if one agrees law does not have a nature, but a culture, then one must account for how the culture of law changes, and has changed, over time. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & Pagos, 868 N.E.2d 4 (Ind. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
Doe 1 moved the trial court to (1) quash a subpoena that Cooley obtained in California seeking his identity, and (2) issue a protective order. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm
But the appointment does not require members to divest their own personal biotech investments. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:30 am
Top 5 Take Away Points 2016 National Work Comp & Disability Conf – Part 1 Top 5 Take Away Points 2016 National Work Comp & Disability Conf – Part 2 Top 5 Take Away Points 2016 National Work Comp & Disability Conf – Part 3 Hello, Michael Stack here with Amaxx. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:05 am
Code § 34-24-3-1 et seq. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:47 am
As to the rest of the time, I like to believe that consumers purchase the brand that either (1) they enjoy the most, (2) they find most affordable, or (3) a combination of the two. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Under the legal standard, "the permissibility of fees charged for the use of state facilities is evaluated under three prongs, which ask whether the fee (1) is based on some fair approximation of use of the facilities, (2) is not excessive in relation to the benefits conferred, and (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
In Stewart for Jane Doe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:56 pm
"A TM infringement plaintiff must show (1) that the TM is valid and entitled to protection, (2) the defendant used the mark, (3) in commerce, (4) in connection with a sale or advertising of goods or services, and (5) without the plaintiff's consent. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 4:20 pm
For data stewardship, to know that “user XYZ prefers not to have history recorded,” or “Jane Doe prefers not to receive email marketing” is to know something about user XYZ and about Jane Doe. [read post]
