Search for: "Jane Genova"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 9:31 pm
By Jane Genova My take, and I'm not alone, on the so-called mis-emailing of Skadden Arps attorney Shelia Birnbaum's message on the Mississippi State Farm-Attorney General Jim Hood tossed case is: That message could have electronically been "mis-sent" to exactly the right people: The media. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:47 am
We published an off-topic post suggesting four new year's resolutions for lawyers interested in marketing their firms.We're please to welcome the new readers joining us as a result of our off-topic escapade, although we don't promise more posts about legal marketing any time soon.In particular, we extend a warm welcome to visitors joining us from Tom Kane's Legal Marketing Blog, Robert Ambrogi at Legal Blog Watch, and a more extended interview with Jane Genova… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:08 pm
But here are some thoughts from Jane Genova. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:13 pm
(Hat tip to Jane Genova at Law and More for bringing the Hildebrandt post to my attention.) [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
On the Law and More blog, Jane Genova asks a related question that is more directly relevant to LBW readers: "Is a lousy law job or job not practicing law better than no job? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:25 pm
[Jane Genova] [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:32 pm
[Soloway]* Jane Genova was not a fan of today’s post by “Juggalo Law” about Caroline Giuliani. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 11:57 am
More: Jane Genova isn't a fan of the initiative (Nov. 27). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
[IMDb]* Some reflections by Jane Genova on politics, law firms, and the power game. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:13 pm
Jane Genova at Law and More doubts it works well before juries -- though of course persuasiveness to a jury might not be the only objective for those who engage in coaching. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:24 pm
Okay, we'll take the bait.Twice yesterday (here and here), Jane Genova over at Law and More asked us whether Congress will pass a bill overruling the Supreme Court's recent decision finding preemption in the context of certain medical devices. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:25 am
Jane Genova at Law and More suggests that Google Scholar will be a great legal research tool for self-represented litigants in her post Everyman a Legal Player: Google Scholar. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Jane Genova's Law and More "congratulated" Mark on his career move, recounted some of his "communications" achievements, and speculated openly on how, if at all, Jones Day would "replace" him. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:23 am
Jane is taking that point to heart. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:41 pm
Here are recent posts from the microblog: Finding "The Complete Guide to Google Wave" (Trapani/Pash free ebook) to be very helpful - http://completewaveguide.com/ Bruce MacEwen follows-up with "The Great "Laterals" Conversation, Chapter 2" - http://bit.ly/1aryLI Ethan Zuckerman on why we fall for fast news - http://bit.ly/cBmMN Getting started with GTD - short primer podcast from David Allen - http://bit.ly/1UV94q Jane Genova points to… [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
-- Jane Genova's post at Law and More analyzes some of the contentions in the motion for change of venue. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 8:21 pm
I thought Balducci held up pretty well to some tough questions, see what you think.UPDATE: Reading through my Bloglines feeds this morning, I saw this post by Jane Genova about an American Lawyer article on Dickie Scruggs. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 10:12 am
Not so surprising a plea, says Jane Genova at Law and More, but rather "widely expected". [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 9:08 pm
Here are recent posts from the microblog: Andy Oram’s great blog series – “Being online: identity, anonymity, and all things in between” – http://bit.ly/4LDyHz Jane Genova: “Writing Instructors: Sentence students to 3 hrs. reading mainstream legal media” – http://bit.ly/5xs349 Ron Friedmann on “New vs. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
(Also Byron Stier at MassTortsProf; Jonathan Adler at Volokh) My question: If the states hire private counsel on a contingency bases for such a risky endeavor (Jane Genova at Law and More), and they prevail, will the states then try to renege on the fee agreement as was done in the smoking cases? [read post]
