Search for: "January v. Sullivan*"
Results 41 - 60
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2007, 9:24 am
* Last Tuesday, a civil action captioned Aaron Brett Charney v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Each month this fiscal year, we have been looking at the Courts of Criminal Appeals' output to see if we can recognize a statistically significant diminution in output in the wake of United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:17 pm
In January of this year, the court agreed to rehear the case en banc. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:44 am
GONZALEZ V. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Patel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
JEFFERSON V. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:41 am
JEFFERSON V. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
Leak v RBI Assoc., Ltd 2020 NY Slip Op 50072(U) Decided on January 14, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Fisher, J. is the story of cupidity, stupidity and criminality. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:13 pm
Pomp cited the case of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 8:27 am
Yesterday an amended verified complaint was filed in Charney v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:23 am
In the January 2, 2020 edition of The Legal Intelligencer Edward T. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:48 am
January 3, 2012) [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:09 am
We got enough material from this morning's hearing in Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
