Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 41 - 60
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 8:30 am
By Jason Rantanen In Global-Tech v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
By Jason Rantanen Many empirical studies of Federal Circuit jurisprudence rely on searches of one of the leading legal databases such as Westlaw or Lexis.1 Relying on a search of a single database is potentially problematic, however, if the substantive content of the databases is not identical - in other words, if Lexis and Westlaw don't contain the same universe of cases, any claims about the results are necessarily limited by the dataset being used. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:45 am
By Jason Rantanen Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Verizon Business Network Services Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:45 am
By Jason Rantanen On October 24, 2015, I’ll be giving the “Patent Law Year in Review” talk at the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:05 am
By Jason Rantanen Next week is PatCon, the largest annual gathering of patent law, economics, and business professors. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:26 pm
By Jason Rantanen I’ve created this post so that folks can comment on the “real names only” rule that I’m applying in the Interpretation-Construction Distinction threads. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Glatt Air Techniques, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
By Jason Rantanen Continuing the string of high-profile center director openings, the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU School of Law is searching for a new executive director. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
By Jason Rantanen Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:18 pm
By Jason Rantanen Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on one of the questions presented in Commil v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
By Jason Rantanen Next Friday, October 2, the Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association will hold its annual conference. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
by Jason Rantanen Tomorrow, Monday April 18th, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Microsoft v. i4i, which presents the question whether proving invalidity requires clear and convincing evidence when the prior art on which the invaldity defense rests was not considered by the PTO. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:54 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m very much looking forward to giving the Patent Year-in-Review talk at the AIPLA annual meeting tomorrow. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
By Jason Rantanen We’re now halfway through financial year 2016, and so far patent application and grant numbers are looking similar to the past few years. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Posted by Jason Rantanen There are many sophisticated and nuanced reasons to oppose H.R. 1249, the 140-page patent bill currently pending before the House of Representatives, but the clearest reason for opposition can be stated in quite simple and stark terms: The proposed legislation would undeniably expand the size of the federal bureaucracy and increase the cost and complexity of the American patent system. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
By Jason Rantanen Dissenting opinions are generally considered to be good predictors of en banc review. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, the negotiating parties (which include the United States) released the final draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a document that purports to combat the proliferation of pirated and counterfeit goods. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:55 am
By Jason Rantanen The conventional approach to the fault elements1 of indirect and willful infringement is to speak of them in mens rea (or state of mind, if you prefer) terms. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm
By Jason Rantanen American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
