Search for: "Jeffrey D M/V"
Results 41 - 60
of 424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
The result has been that the public company D&O insurers now generally insist on a separate retention for M&A litigation (usually set as high as $1 million or more), in order to reduce the chance of high frequency deal-related litigation producing significant D&O insurance loss costs. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:29 pm
Davis (NFP) Jeffrey Berkey v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:56 am
Curfman, M.D., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey M. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
South Bend, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. of Feasterville, Pennsylvania sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Jeffrey M. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:38 pm
I'm also quite sure there are examples of blog posts or other online media having an effect on Supreme Court arguments or opinions, though I'm not sure that all of the examples documented in the article—Walter Dellinger's comments on NPR, the federalism argument in U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:56 pm
--Jeffrey Toobin, The Nine 207-8 (2007)So, Bush v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Case Name: Mickelson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Case Name: Mickelson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:18 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeffrey Robinson v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
§ 7-19-307(a)(d). [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:57 am
Pollack" Jeffrey D. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Eric D. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:36 pm
Divorce case, I assume.Except it's Jeffrey Stuard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 11:30 pm
Scott v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Plaintiff Jeffrey A. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
Heesters & Jeffrey N. [read post]
11 May 2017, 12:59 pm
From the complaint in Myers v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am
We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]
