Search for: "Jesse Griffin"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Tony Mauro in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, and David Ovalle in the Miami Herald. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and the BBC News, while at Education Week Mark Walsh looks at the case’s implications for schools. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Other early coverage comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Josh Gerstein at Politico; Jaclyn Belcyk at JURIST; Sahil Kapur at Talking Points Memo; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; Steven Mazie of The Economist; Greg Stohr at Bloomberg Businessweek; Bill Mears at CNN; and Richard Wolf of USA Today. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
” Additional commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Justia’s Verdict blog, and Joshua Davey in an op-ed for the New York Post. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, NPR’s Nina Totenberg (who has another story this morning) Mark Walsh for Education Week’s School Law Blog, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters (via MSN), and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” And in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports on efforts to remove the Confederate flag from license plates in other states. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
In another post, he considers Justice Thomas’s suggestion that the Court’s decision in Griffin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Commentary on Paroline comes from Rick Hasen, who predicts at his Election Law Blog that Congress will step in to override the Court’s decision, “and probably relatively quickly,” and from Marci Hamilton, who proposes a possible fix at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Three spouses of justices enter the guest box: Ashley Kavanaugh, Jesse Barrett, and Patrick Jackson. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
In a three-part series at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights (here, here, and here), Leslie Griffin cites Town of Greece and Hobby Lobby as evidence that the Court’s religious make-up “makes a difference,” because the “opinions suggest the Justices are influenced by their religious worldviews in interpreting religion and the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison discusses Kerry v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
Lissa Griffin analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
Commentary comes from Elizabeth Slattery at The Daily Signal, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Leslie Griffin at Justia’s Verdict blog. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
Even Jesse himself got into the action. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Leslie Griffin argues that yesterday’s two rulings, as well as the recent decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Leslie Griffin weighs in on Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm
Lonergan and Jesse W. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Griffin, Current Development 2009-2010: Reinventing Adequacy: The need for standardized Regulation, 23 Geo. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
At the Brookings Institution, Stuart Brotman looks at the winners and losers from last week’s decision, while at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights Courtney Soliday praises the dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia, arguing that Scalia “addressed the appropriate remedy, which is to apply the law as it stands and leave to Congress the task of deciding whether the Copyright Act needs an upgrade. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Malvina Halberstam reviews last week’s oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
