Search for: "John Doe Defendants 1-3" Results 41 - 60 of 3,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
John Does 1 - 13," Patrick Collins, Inc. of Canoga Park, California ("Patrick Collins"), alleged direct and contributory infringement by 13 then-unidentified individuals including John Doe No. 7. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
The OCME identified a mixture of DNA from at least three (3) people, including one (1) major male contributor. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Plaintiff also sufficiently alleged knowledge by alleging that “Defendant knew or should have known of this relationship between Plaintiff and John Doe customers. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 pm by The Law Office of Nancy King
Federal and state laws allow so-called 'John Doe' warrants, which identify a suspect by means other than a name. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
Cooley Law School (Cooley) filed a complaint in Ingham County against Defendant John Doe 1 (Doe 1) alleging defamation arising from statements that Doe 1 made on a website that, under a pseudonym, criticized Cooley. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Supp.2d, so as to avoid misleading lawyers.” The October decision authorized service of a subpoena by mail in Canada for purposes of discovering the identity of the defendant, who was sued as a John Doe. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am by pfriedman
” They are: (1) political exploitation of the gap between the Furman decision and popular opinion; (2) adversarial legal proceedings featuring cultural tensions between capital punishment and liberal humanism; (3) the political association of capital punishment with larger political and cultural issues, such as civil rights, states’ rights, and crime control; (4) demands for revenge; and (5) the emotional power of imagining killing and death. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Last year, I wrote about the non-compete case involving high-profile New York banker, John Kanas. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's what I'd call the money quote in the story:What appears to happen during this time—the years I look at are 1994 to 2008, just based on the data that’s available—is that the probability that a district attorney files a felony charge against an arrestee goes from about 1 in 3, to 2 in 3. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
But federal courts generally view Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) as presumptively barring pseudonymous litigation, so the federal judge (Judge James Gwin) on his own initiative required the parties to explain why they should remain anonymous—and ultimately concluded that they had to be identified: On March 12, 2020, Plaintiff John Doe sued Defendant Jane Doe in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:52 pm
Sometimes, the targets of disparaging comments react by filing lawsuits in state or federal courts against unidentified ("John Doe") defendants for claims such as violation of securities laws, breach of confidentiality agreement, and libel. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
Jane Does #3 and #4 File Motion to Join With Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Recently Jane Does #3 and #4 came forward and filed their Joinder Motion in this CVRA lawsuit. [read post]