Search for: "John Gore" Results 41 - 60 of 936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 5:40 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Gore decision in 2000 that handed the White House to President George W. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
” When one of us (Andy) worked for Vice President Al Gore, a significant portion of the Office of Vice President staff was paid for out of the Senate budget, and those staff members had to abide by a different set of ethics rules than the Executive Branch staff. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts also voiced skepticism about the broad power that Thompson was asserting. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action? [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:24 am
Look around.I'll just quote an old post of mine, from 2004, my first year of blogging:[O]n that subject of [John] Kerry's getting overtanned for debate purposes: Kerry, like Gore before him, seems to think it's good to be tan for a debate, a belief can be traced to Kennedy's appearance in the 1960 debate. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:23 am by Bernard Bell
  John Gore, the head of the Civil Rights Division, was tasked with drafting the letter, for signature by and Arthur Gary, General Counsel of the Justice Management Division. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I had not previously met Jeanne Sheehan Zaino or Wilfred Codrington (though I did happily blurb the book on constitutional amendment that Wilfred co-authored with John Kowal). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But good progressives would almost certainly agree that John Q. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am by Michael C. Dorf
My view--shared by just about every reputable constitutional scholar--is that Article II and the Eleventh Amendment already make the VP's role ceremonial, but if I'm wrong and the likes of John Eastman are right that the Constitution gives the VP the power to make substantive judgments, then it's not clear how Congress could by statute take that power away. [read post]