Search for: "Johnson, N. v. Page, D."
Results 41 - 60
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
§82.005(d)(2) (emphasis added). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Delgado-Colón, Chief Judge, U.S. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In BP P.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:43 am
Cal.) in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Key Precedent Ohio Constitution, Article II, Section 15(D) (“[n]o bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Seattle’s Gary Locke may become new Commerce Secretary (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) US Patent Reform Bill to be introduced on Monday... [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Bausch & Lomb, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Release of false marking claims applies to all products marked with patent mumbers: Simonian v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:10 pm
The technical legal question before the Court in Nevada Comm'n on Ethics v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
" He gave some examples of why the cost of this litigation was so high—searching through "millions" of emails and reviewing "hundreds of thousands" of documents during discovery, over forty depositions taken, and a forty-page motion for summary judgment. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Any person has standing to bring false patent marking claim: Simonian v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Jacks n/k/a/ Marla D. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Maxine Huff, et al. , a 13-page opinion, Judge Brown writes:Lloyd N. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:29 am
Case Name: Wilkening v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:29 am
Case Name: Wilkening v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
