Search for: "Johnson v. Board of Education" Results 41 - 60 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 7 November 2022, judgment was handed down in the case of AB v Chief Constable of British Transport Police [2022] EWHC 2749 (KB) by Mr Justice Johnson. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
The Perpetrators also represented to the Migrants that if they “were willing to board airplanes to other states, they would receive employment, housing, educational opportunities, and other like assistance at their arrival. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, it probably reinforces a terrible tendency to view “constitutional law” as the product of the kind of “case-crunching” that legal education teaches. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Remarkably, there are state and federal court judges who continue to misunderstand and misinterpret regulatory risk assessments, notwithstanding efforts to educate the judiciary. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm by Ediberto Roman
Board of Education, with many intervening cases and the momentous Civil Rights movement in betwee [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]