Search for: "Johnson v. Division of Employment" Results 41 - 60 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by David G. Badertscher
Mojica, 726/2007 Appellate Division, Second DepartmentProducts Liability Claims of Non-New York Residents in Multi-District Oxycontin Litigation Are Dismissed Matter of OxyContin II, 700000/07 NEW YORK COUNTYAlternative Dispute Resolution Employer's Application to Stay Arbitration Is Barred Over Active Participation Waterfront Commission of NY Harbor v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between an individual's "domicile" and his or her "residence"Campaniello v New York State Div. of Tax Appeals Trib., 2018 NY Slip Op 03400, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFrom time to time an applicant for public employment or an employee is required to be "domiciled"* with the physical jurisdiction of the employer. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 2:03 pm
  The corporation had a substantial annual contract – in the amount of $269,000 – with Global Pharmaceutical Sourcing Group (GPSG), which is a division of Johnson & Johnson, Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Jude and Biosense Webster (a division of Johnson & Johnson) are direct competitors and have litigated a number of non-compete disputes in various jurisdictions around the country. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:41 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 35 AD3d 297, said the Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was in bad faith, unlawful, or for an impermissible reason. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
The regulations appear to be a response to the holding in Gattuso v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:42 pm
Three new opinions out of Division III. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Johnson v Goyette, 2018 ABCA 353 AREAS OF LAW: Family law; Unjust enrichment; Joint family venture ~A trial judge’s finding on whether a joint family venture exists is a factual one, reviewable only for palpable and overriding error.~ BACKGROUND The Appellant, Sandra Johnson, and the Respondent, Danielle Goyette, were in a 13-year common-law relationship. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:49 am
Filing disciplinary charges and holding a disciplinary hearing obviates the individuals right to a name-clearing hearing Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]