Search for: "Johnson v. Eighth Judicial District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8544, both ask essentially: (1) whether Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
It asks: (1) whether Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
But the Court soon amended the order list to specify that it was limiting its grant to the first of Moore’s two questions presented: “[w]hether it violates the Eighth Amendment and the Court’s decisions in Hall v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:49 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
March 26, 2014) (District of Columbia) (non-product liability). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Yet another Johnson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Maryland violations by the district attorney in Orleans Parish. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
The federal district court agreed, Rodriguez then pled guilty conditionally, and on appeal the Eighth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
At its Conference on January 9, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as state bans on same-sex marriage, proof of intent in a constructive discharge case, personal jurisdiction to award a no-contact order, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that the Guidelines were constitutional. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
The Arizona Supreme Court has expressly declined to rule on this issue. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
But on Wednesday morning, the Court will again confront the Sphinx-like (Justice Scalia prefers “Delphic”) residual clause, in Johnson v. [read post]
