Search for: "Johnson v. Hudson"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm
Similarly, violations of the knock-and-announce rule do not warrant suppression, see Hudson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
” Hudson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
” And Johnson, unlike Hudson, involved pre-trial detainees. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Hudson (@raleighlaura) Felicity Aston (@fpaston) Contact Monkey (@ContactMonkey) Debbie Pollard Pawlowski (@majesticmills) Kate Haueisen (@kateh32 and @vid4pro) Dawn (@DiscoInfiltrato) Melissa Thomas (@missybassettlaw) [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:51 am
The Ninth finds a little light, amongst the gray.United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
That’s what the defendant did in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
See Connick v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
Johnson, 194 N.J. 276, 282 (2008). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Brunsting, Stephen Brusell, Mark Bryan, David Bryant, Eulonda Bryant, Robert Bryant, Displaced Bubba, Byron Buckley, Carl Buhlman, Richard Burke, Erik Burrows, Randy Bush, Jay Buxton, Phyllis Byrd, Marie Cajuste, Joseph T Calhoon, Michelle Calhoun, Brian Callaghan, Mandy Camden, Heidi Campbell, Tom Campbell, Pedro Canahuati, Mike Canavan, Nicholas Cancelliere, Julia Cannon, Eric Cantor, Sam Cao, Linda Cappuccio, Britt Carlile, Tirzah Carpio, Josh Carrico, Jason Cash, Jim Cashion, Chris Casson,… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[22] While Virginia Pharmacy found that commercial speech is entitled to at least some level of First Amendment protection, the level of judicial review was not articulated until a few years later in the seminal case Central Hudson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
In Smithey v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm
Eric Johnson sent out swatches of the color as part of his Museum of IP, so I also have that [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
.), Ron Johnson (Wis.). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
” The majority’s discussion of this principle was remarkably thin, resting on just two cases: Johnson v. [read post]
