Search for: "Johnson v. Redding" Results 41 - 60 of 392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Bill Marler
, Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c), and acts like the plant toxin ricin by inhibiting protein synthesis in endothelial and other cells. [16]   Endothelial cells line the interior surface of blood vessels and are known to be extremely sensitive to E. coliO157:H7, which is cytotoxigenic to these cells. [16] In addition to Shiga toxin, E. coli O157:H7 produces numerous other putative virulence factors, including proteins which aid in the attachment and colonization of the… [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Nuclear Blast America * 512(f) Claim Fails in the 11th Circuit–Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  For example, in my article “Optimistic Originalism and the Reconstruction Amendments,” I wrote: “Originalist adherence to Article V as the sole legitimate means of constitutional change is a red thread that runs through and unifies what are otherwise quite disparate versions of the theory. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
Nuclear Blast America * 512(f) Claim Fails in the 11th Circuit–Johnson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]