Search for: "Johnson v. Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
This version of Johnson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Sonya Strickland, a Junction City public defender, won in State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated basic principles of Strickland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
Johnson & Son, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
If that rings a bell for you, it’s either tinnitus or because the Court already invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause in Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:28 pm
Under Lafler v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
In Donnie Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Tingley v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, taking a mere seven pages to summarily and unanimously reverse the Third Circuit’s grant of habeas relief. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:03 am
Strickland, Esq., Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 2029 Century Park East, Los Angeles, CA 90067. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Johnson, 13-10288, have all been redistributed for the March 20 Conference. [read post]
