Search for: "Jones v. Federal Communications Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:18 pm
Federal Trade Commission et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
" The justices will decide whether the Federal Communications Commission's standards for nudity and indecency on television are so vague as to be unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:40 am
The court in the recent case of Jones v Tsige [2011] ONSC 1475 (Ont. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
Does the Federal Communication Commission have the authority to determine the classification of broadband internet service providers? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., which asks whether the Hobbs Act, a jurisdictional-channeling statute, requires courts to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s interpretation of a statute allowing recipients of “junk faxes” to sue the senders for damages; in this post, Bell considers “whether the Hobbs Act applies at all. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:16 am
Fox Television Stations (I already love it just from the title), the Court will determine “whether the Federal Communications Commission’s current indecency-enforcement regime violates the First or Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission unlawfully reclassified broadband internet-access service as a “telecommunications service” under 47 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
Bustos, Stefanik, Jones and Pramila Jayapal (D. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Pasquale III, Federal Search Commission? [read post]
Bypassing the telecoms: 'Stingrays' allow direct government phone surveillance with little oversight
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm
Soghoian struck out on FOIA requests submitted to the DOJ, but learned more from the Federal Communications Commission which must approve their use. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
The court will consider whether the Federal Communication Commission’s standards for indecency on television are unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
