Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am
In answer to a written question from Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury, Lab) to the Secretary of State for Justice asking “when her Department plans to publish a response to the Law Commission report entitled Celebrating Marriage: A New Weddings Law, published in July 2022”, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Alex Davies-Jones, said this: “We are aware that the Law Commission made recommendations for wholesale change of weddings law in July 2022. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 1:00 pm
Sponsored by the State Bar of Texas Paralegal Division, “On Silver Stars We Soar Into TAPS 2024” will feature three days of CLE, networking, a keynote speech by State Bar Immediate Past President Cindy V. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 8:39 am
From Monday's decision in City of Conneaut v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
He started kissing the friend, and in a fit of jealousy, Jones slapped him. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm
In Dahlia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:46 am
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:46 am
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:46 am
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm
Remember how during the Sarah Palin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
As a general rule, Jones Act claims filed in state court cannot be removed to federal court. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Jones, 705 So. 2d 1356, (Fla. 1998) — have brought us to the present state where it is safe to settle with, and dismiss, actively liable tortfeasors. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:14 am
Inc., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 am
There was disagreement on the reasoning, but only two members of the 16-judge en banc panel dissented that the state’s permit process is constitutional, despite the Supreme Court’s significant expansion of gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am
“‘Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification”‘ (Maggio v 24 W 57 APF, LLC, 134 AD3d 621, 625 [1st Dept 2015], quoting Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409,409 [1st Dept 2010]; see also Pough v Aegis Prop. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
From Van Deelen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am
The Fifth Circuit had such a ruling today, United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:02 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am
State v. [read post]
