Search for: "Jones v. The People of the State of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Ed Shanahan reports for the New York Times. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Supreme Court was interpreting federal fraud statutes, and this case is about New York courts interpreting New York state statutes. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Hakeem Jeffries of New York) who each week holds a news conference to slam the most extreme rulings by GOP judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
The ruling is the latest significant decision dismantling a gun restriction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s expansion of Second Amendment rights last year in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  Each subsequent version of his preamble, however, began with the same three words—“We the People”—indicating that the new system rested on popular sovereignty. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:24 pm by John Floyd
For example, an article in The New York Times states that over 10,000 court verdicts are under review in Denmark due to the Danish authorities’ improper analysis of cellular call detail records. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
The New York Times ran this interesting article this week. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Erin Carroll
And news organizations litigated landmark cases, like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
Juston Jones reports for the New York Times. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The ‘Cost’ of Voting in America: A look at where it’s easiest and hardest Seattle Times – Nick Corasaniti and Allison McCann (New York Times) | Published: 9/21/2022 A new study ranks all 50 states based on the overall investment a resident must make, in time and resources, to vote. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]